top of page
< Back

Pendolino V. LCI A.K.A G2 Risk Solutions

Credlocity’s Anthony Pendolino Fights Back: Landmark FCRA Lawsuit Challenges Inaccurate Bankruptcy Reporting by LCI

In a groundbreaking move, Credlocity's client, Anthony Pendolino, has filed a significant lawsuit against LCI, also known as G2 Risk Solutions, for violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). This case could set a new precedent in the realm of credit repair, particularly concerning the removal of inaccurately reported bankruptcies from credit reports.

The Crux of the Case: FCRA Violations and Inaccurate Bankruptcy Reporting

Anthony Pendolino's lawsuit against LCI centers on the company's failure to comply with the FCRA's stringent requirement for “maximum possible accuracy of the information” reported to credit bureaus. LCI had inaccurately reported a bankruptcy to TransUnion, severely impacting Pendolino's credit score and overall financial health. Credlocity, renowned for its commitment to consumer rights and expert credit repair services, is spearheading this legal challenge to protect its client's rights and ensure justice.

Successful Bankruptcy Removal from Equifax and Experian

Anthony Pendolino was successful in having the inaccurate bankruptcy removed from his Equifax and Experian credit reports by disputing the accuracy with LexisNexis. However, the battle with TransUnion and LCI continues, highlighting the inconsistencies in the credit reporting process and the challenges consumers face in maintaining accurate credit histories.

The Personal Impact: Harm to Anthony and His Family

The inaccurate bankruptcy report has caused Anthony Pendolino significant irreparable harm. He is unable to co-sign a student loan for his son, jeopardizing his son's college education. Without the necessary financing, his son may be forced to leave school, causing immense stress and potential disruption to his academic future. This personal and financial strain underscores the real-world consequences of inaccurate credit reporting and the urgent need for reform.

Bankruptcy Rule 9037: A Barrier to Accurate Reporting

One of the key issues in this lawsuit is the inherent challenge in verifying bankruptcy information due to Bankruptcy Rule 9037. This rule mandates the redaction of sensitive information in bankruptcy filings, allowing only the last four digits of a Social Security number and the year of birth to be visible. This limited information makes it nearly impossible to conclusively verify that a bankruptcy filing pertains to a specific individual. Given the statistical probability that out of 119 people, there is a 50% chance that two individuals share the same last four digits of their Social Security numbers, the potential for misreporting is significant.

As stated in Bankruptcy Rule 9037:

"(a) REDACTED FILINGS. Unless the court orders otherwise, in an electronic or paper filing made with the court that contains an individual's social-security number, taxpayer-identification number, or birth date, the name of an individual, other than the debtor, known to be and identified as a minor, or a financial-account number, a party or nonparty making the filing may include only:(1) the last four digits of the social-security number and taxpayer-identification number;(2) the year of the individual's birth;(3) the minor's initials; and(4) the last four digits of the financial-account number."

Credlocity: Leading the Charge in Credit Repair

Credlocity, the fastest-growing credit repair company in the United States, is dedicated to advocating for consumer rights and providing top-notch credit repair services. By taking on this case, Credlocity aims to highlight the flaws in the current credit reporting system and push for changes that ensure greater accuracy and fairness for all consumers.

The Importance of Maximum Possible Accuracy

The FCRA's requirement for “maximum possible accuracy of the information” is a critical component of fair credit reporting. Inaccurate information, such as a wrongly reported bankruptcy, can have devastating effects on an individual's credit score, making it difficult to obtain loans, credit cards, or even employment. By challenging LCI's practices, Credlocity is working to uphold the integrity of the credit reporting system and protect consumers from the adverse effects of inaccurate reporting.

Implications for the Future

This lawsuit not only seeks justice for Anthony Pendolino but also aims to set a precedent for how credit reporting agencies handle bankruptcy information. If successful, it could lead to stricter enforcement of FCRA standards and more rigorous verification processes, ultimately benefiting millions of consumers nationwide.

Conclusion

The lawsuit filed by Credlocity on behalf of Anthony Pendolino against LCI represents a pivotal moment in the credit repair industry. By challenging the inaccuracies in bankruptcy reporting and advocating for stricter adherence to the FCRA, Credlocity is paving the way for a fairer and more accurate credit reporting system. Stay tuned for updates on this landmark case and what it means for the future of credit repair and consumer rights.







bottom of page